I am researching sump layout and design and came across the 'Triton' sump layout.
Basically the Triton sump puts the refugium in the first section then the skimmer in the middle and pump on the third section. The overflow from each chamber is changed a little bit and it recommends a variety of macro and PO4 reactors.
My question is compared to the 'traditional' sump layout (skimmer/fuge/pump) will this be ok to run even though I dont use Triton? Any negatives on this layout.
to me it makes sense to feed the macros the PO4 and detritus directly first since thats like fertilizer. I probly would go sockless so the pods get a chance
any thoughts?
Basically the Triton sump puts the refugium in the first section then the skimmer in the middle and pump on the third section. The overflow from each chamber is changed a little bit and it recommends a variety of macro and PO4 reactors.
My question is compared to the 'traditional' sump layout (skimmer/fuge/pump) will this be ok to run even though I dont use Triton? Any negatives on this layout.
to me it makes sense to feed the macros the PO4 and detritus directly first since thats like fertilizer. I probly would go sockless so the pods get a chance
any thoughts?
Last edited: