makes me wonder though, what is the standard of measure for reefers on what is "edited" vs. "WYSIWYG"?
as a photo buff, i find it incredibly difficult to define a "natural" photo, because it's not just the type of light that impacts the photo. you have a series of options within the camera to adjust the color temperature, which would greatly impact the colors shown in the pic.
i generally shot photos in raw with a flat processing, so when it comes directly out of the camera, it always looks a bit washed out. i do that because when you boost the contrast in the camera, you lose some digital information which can not be recovered, whereas if you go with the neutral process, you can adjust contrast and saturation in post-processing.
i don't consider anything that comes directly out of my camera to be "WYSIWYG", because they all require additional processing to be color accurate.
add to that, the color rendition of everyone's monitor's different. My monitor is color calibrated every 15 days, which does me absolutely no good on web-destined images. the colors are calibrated to the print machine specific to the signal hill costco, so i know that what's on my screen, is what would print out at costco.
so, what do people consider WYSIWYG?