Siporax Discussion

Joined
Jul 5, 2007
Messages
912
Likes
40
Points
28
Location
Anaheim, CA
#41
That 1 lb per gallon rule was just that, a guess.

These medias have been around a long time, and minimalist scapes have been around for quite a few years, but its a recent push by a lot of these companies like its some kind of new technology.
Sera actually never pushed Siporax. In fact they had discontinued it. Once it caught on with reef keepers, we started buying up all the remaining batches. They caught on to the demand and just recently started producing the product again. With the removal of sand beds and minimalist scapes, reefkeepers began looking for alternative means of denitrification. When Triton revealed that ceramic medias were leaching metals, the search was on for a product that had no chance of leaching. Siporax being made of glass, was the natural solution. Many feel that Seachem Matrix is also a very fine choice per all I have read. There really is no way to overdo these products. It's simply additional surface area for bacteria to colonize.
 

reefes pieces

Premium Member
Supporter
Joined
Oct 5, 2011
Messages
4,834
Likes
87
Points
48
Location
Placentia
#42
Point being I think that proper biofiltration tends to get overlooked until recently when reefers experience nuisance issues such as cyano and left dumbfounded because all their parameters, lighting and flow are in check. This tech isn't new or revolutionary, but most likely made its comeback due to demand vs proactive marketing. But if your tank ain't broke then don't fix it. And if you have problems then always try to remedy the source of the problem first
 

lowbudget

Premium Member
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
22,203
Likes
88
Points
48
Location
los angeles
#43
so this siporax would be better than zeo rocks?

They have the same denitrifying properties. The pore sizes on siporax is much smaller than zeo and cannot become clogged. Zeo is a natural product and due to it's larger pore sizes, it becomes clogged and shaking the rocks can no longer help. This is why you periodically must replace a portion of the zeo rocks.
 

lowbudget

Premium Member
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
22,203
Likes
88
Points
48
Location
los angeles
#44
so this siporax would be better than zeo rocks?

They have the same denitrifying properties. The pore sizes on siporax is much smaller than zeo and cannot become clogged. Zeo is a natural product and due to it's larger pore sizes, it becomes clogged and shaking the rocks can no longer help. This is why you periodically must replace a portion of the zeo rocks.
 

lowbudget

Premium Member
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
22,203
Likes
88
Points
48
Location
los angeles
#45
will bacteria start dying off if there isn't enough for it to consume?
Sera actually never pushed Siporax. In fact they had discontinued it. Once it caught on with reef keepers, we started buying up all the remaining batches. They caught on to the demand and just recently started producing the product again. With the removal of sand beds and minimalist scapes, reefkeepers began looking for alternative means of denitrification. When Triton revealed that ceramic medias were leaching metals, the search was on for a product that had no chance of leaching. Siporax being made of glass, was the natural solution. Many feel that Seachem Matrix is also a very fine choice per all I have read. There really is no way to overdo these products. It's simply additional surface area for bacteria to colonize.
 

lowbudget

Premium Member
Supporter
Joined
Nov 26, 2007
Messages
22,203
Likes
88
Points
48
Location
los angeles
#46
will bacteria start dying off if there isn't enough for it to consume?
Sera actually never pushed Siporax. In fact they had discontinued it. Once it caught on with reef keepers, we started buying up all the remaining batches. They caught on to the demand and just recently started producing the product again. With the removal of sand beds and minimalist scapes, reefkeepers began looking for alternative means of denitrification. When Triton revealed that ceramic medias were leaching metals, the search was on for a product that had no chance of leaching. Siporax being made of glass, was the natural solution. Many feel that Seachem Matrix is also a very fine choice per all I have read. There really is no way to overdo these products. It's simply additional surface area for bacteria to colonize.
 
Joined
Jul 5, 2007
Messages
912
Likes
40
Points
28
Location
Anaheim, CA
#47
so this siporax would be better than zeo rocks?
define better! With zeo, they claim there are things that get absorbed deep into the rocks. I have no ideas if that is marketing mumbo jumbo or just the pores becoming clogged. if it is just the pores becoming clogged, then I suspect you could replace the zeo rocks with Siporax or even Matrix. I'm not the type of guy who likes to experiment. I just try to choose a system, understand it's strengths and weaknesses, and go with it.
 

solitude127

Instant Ocean User
Supporter
Featured Reef
2020 POTM
Joined
Apr 13, 2010
Messages
7,001
Likes
51
Points
48
Location
Torrance
#52
How much siporax are you guys running and what's your water volume?

Also, how many 25mm rings do you think equals a liter?
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Messages
1,209
Likes
14
Points
38
Location
Corona
#56
I'm running 24 liters (25mm) and I have a water volume of 160 about.. you are suppose to stack them vertical and keep them detritus free which I do neither. :)
 

solitude127

Instant Ocean User
Supporter
Featured Reef
2020 POTM
Joined
Apr 13, 2010
Messages
7,001
Likes
51
Points
48
Location
Torrance
#57
I'm running 24 liters (25mm) and I have a water volume of 160 about.. you are suppose to stack them vertical and keep them detritus free which I do neither. :)
WOW, that seems like a lot. isn't it supposed to be 1l for every 50ish gallons?
 
Joined
Oct 15, 2008
Messages
221
Likes
5
Points
18
#58
Heres two liters of 15mm. I went with 15mm because of limited space. It does take more time to stack.

 

Latest posts

Top