WHy, yes, I think it reasonable to assume, that the last moderator to view it, and respond to it, is responsible for closing it...
I would imagine that coincidence do happen, but for a reasonalbe outcome to comne from a reasonable event, especially from a moderator that has done similar in the past, would be a REASONABLE ASSUMPTION;
Shoot me if that reasonable assumption happens to be wrong this time...
Like I said originally, if you cant holdyour own on the issue, you tend to try to sidetrack the subject by using tactics to diffuse the issue...
Stay on subject if you can..
The thread is about low post counts, i.e more traffic, i.e justify the $$$ for sponsors, etc...
The answer is the subject, not your refusal to accept responsibility, and or accept that you or someone else dont know the answer, (while denying others suggestions as to why)
I would imagine that coincidence do happen, but for a reasonalbe outcome to comne from a reasonable event, especially from a moderator that has done similar in the past, would be a REASONABLE ASSUMPTION;
Shoot me if that reasonable assumption happens to be wrong this time...
Like I said originally, if you cant holdyour own on the issue, you tend to try to sidetrack the subject by using tactics to diffuse the issue...
Stay on subject if you can..
The thread is about low post counts, i.e more traffic, i.e justify the $$$ for sponsors, etc...
The answer is the subject, not your refusal to accept responsibility, and or accept that you or someone else dont know the answer, (while denying others suggestions as to why)