Nikon camera user

Wankel

2
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2012
Messages
1,475
Likes
5
Points
0
Location
Torrance
#2
No, you need a fixed focal length not a telephoto.

Look for a 90mm, or a 105mm macro lens. If its Nikon brand it will be called Micro, they are pricey though.
 
Joined
Jan 17, 2014
Messages
1,466
Likes
16
Points
38
Location
Redlands
#3
I disagree. A zoom vs a prime doesn't make a difference as far as macro shots are concerned. All that does is determine where (distance from the subject) you can be.

Take your camera to the seller and try it out. I'm sure the seller can tell you more about it and you can see if it'll get you the shots at the distance you want to be at. There's a little more than just getting a macro lens to getting good macro shots but I would think this one would get you in the ball park.

No, you need a fixed focal length not a telephoto.
 

Wankel

2
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2012
Messages
1,475
Likes
5
Points
0
Location
Torrance
#4
Sorry I meant zoom, not telephoto. But I disagree, of course it will get you in the ballpark, any lens will. These lenses weren't solely made for macro, they just have the capability. Far from what a true dedicated prime macro lens will achieve.

I'm far from a pro in photography but I feel that if your going to get a lens for something specific don't cut corners, and get exactly what you need, the zoom lenses are more than 50% cheaper than the prime lenses and there's a reason for it.

Also if you don't have a frag rack/frag tank I wouldn't even bother, to get good quality perfectly clear photos the object needs to be close at 1:1 (depending on the focal length of your lens). I don't like frag racks, I put coral in my tank to grow them out not frag and sell, so when trying to focus on a specific coral at the bottom of the tank its nearly impossible without blocking your light source, especially with a Avast Port Hole.

THEN, say you DID buy a zoom "macro" lens, the higher the zoom the more steady you have to be. Unless you have a tripod or some sort of mounting device forget about clear pictures because non of them will be.
 
Last edited:

Wankel

2
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2012
Messages
1,475
Likes
5
Points
0
Location
Torrance
#5
To answer your question though, this is the lens I will be buying - Tokina 90mm f/2.5 nikon
 

Wankel

2
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2012
Messages
1,475
Likes
5
Points
0
Location
Torrance
#8
Heres some more info I just found, Ken Rockwell sight is awesome for information!

http://www.kenrockwell.com/tokina/100mm-f28.htm

I specifically like this part -

"If you want to shoot dedicated macro, 200mm lenses are better because you get more working distance between your camera and your subject to make lighting, and your subject, more comfortable."

200mm might be a bit much though.
 
Last edited:
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Messages
1,209
Likes
14
Points
38
Location
Corona
#9
Ya the same ken Rockwell that's says shooting in raw is a waste and the same ken Rockwell that says people that shoot raw can't shoot because they cannot get their settings right. Some of his info is good but that example IMO his info is bad.

You want to get a 1:1 macro lens and use a tripod or an IS lens and maybe a remote release shutter if your on a tripod. Of course turning off all water movement helps greatly too.
 

solitude127

Instant Ocean User
Supporter
Featured Reef
2020 POTM
Joined
Apr 13, 2010
Messages
7,001
Likes
51
Points
48
Location
Torrance
#10
One of the attributes of a true macro lens is the minimum focal distance. True macro lens have minimum focal lengths of inches where zoom/telephoto lens are usually feet.
 
Joined
Sep 9, 2013
Messages
4,628
Likes
32
Points
48
Location
Long Beach CA
#11
Ya the same ken Rockwell that's says shooting in raw is a waste and the same ken Rockwell that says people that shoot raw can't shoot because they cannot get their settings right. Some of his info is good but that example IMO his info is bad.

You want to get a 1:1 macro lens and use a tripod or an IS lens and maybe a remote release shutter if your on a tripod. Of course turning off all water movement helps greatly too.
it really depends on the perspective. the thing is, coral macro really isn't a big part of photography, and you're not going to get much technical / specific info on it.

his comment about 200mm being better, is for headshots, which i agree with.

i was gonna get a 180mm, but practicality and $$$$ decided the 100mm for me.

if money wasn't a factor, i'd be shooting coral macros with the 180.
 
Joined
Aug 27, 2008
Messages
1,209
Likes
14
Points
38
Location
Corona
#12
I agree 100 percent.

it really depends on the perspective. the thing is, coral macro really isn't a big part of photography, and you're not going to get much technical / specific info on it.

his comment about 200mm being better, is for headshots, which i agree with.

i was gonna get a 180mm, but practicality and $$$$ decided the 100mm for me.

if money wasn't a factor, i'd be shooting coral macros with the 180.
 
Top