Should i go with a thick or thin substrare?

Should i go with a thick or thin substrare?

  • Thick

    Votes: 13 48.1%
  • Thin

    Votes: 14 51.9%

  • Total voters
    27

JOSE CASAS

Premium Member
Supporter
Joined
Jan 31, 2008
Messages
8,286
Likes
29
Points
48
Location
Fullerton
#21
Thin looks good and we all know there is more than one way to skin a cat right lol!


Thick is better as far as reducing nitrate. Thin is all for looks and will acumilate stuff with no real benefit beside growing pods. You really need a DSB 4''-6'' to fully work on reducing no3 hth. Did you decide how much sand you are putting in your tank yet?[/Q

I went thin, because I asked the whole world (figure of speech) about it, and did a lot of research, and I learned that a DSB is good for a year or two, but the majority (people who had tanks for 10+ years) of the tanks that had a DSB all crashed, because of the build up of gases, released in their tanks over time, and I am doing this for the long haul.

Yes it is good for nitrates, but there is other ways of reducing nitrates, like vodka dosing, and using Prodibio BioClean, This stuff digests the sludge, and organic waste, and other stuff which reduce nitrates, phosphates, carbohydrates, and other stuff. Of course this means a cleaner, healthier, more flourishing tank, with out crashes!

I know a lot of reefers don't agree with this, so I ask those who don't agree, to go look at LFS's that have been selling corals for over 10+ years, and see if they have a DSB!
 

therapy

New member
Joined
Jun 13, 2007
Messages
467
Likes
1
Points
0
#27
i go with thin and replace the whole thing occasionally. I do have some wrasses though that like thick sand thats piled up in some places
 
Joined
Nov 27, 2009
Messages
3,098
Likes
24
Points
0
Location
Brea, CA
#28
1-2" for me. I think BB doesn't look real natural. I think the key to high flow and no sandstorms is bigger grains of sand. I am currently in the process of removing my sugar-sized sand to replace with 1-2mm stuff. The left quarter of my tank will be closer to 3" deep for my wrasse(s) to sleep in, but the rest will be 1-2" max, mostly 1".

DSB are great for low nutrients, but why take 1/4 of your display space for it? I think they are best done remotely in a refugium. Just my .02
 
Joined
Oct 19, 2008
Messages
1,951
Likes
11
Points
38
Location
Irvine
#32
1-2" for me. I think BB doesn't look real natural. I think the key to high flow and no sandstorms is bigger grains of sand. I am currently in the process of removing my sugar-sized sand to replace with 1-2mm stuff. The left quarter of my tank will be closer to 3" deep for my wrasse(s) to sleep in, but the rest will be 1-2" max, mostly 1".

DSB are great for low nutrients, but why take 1/4 of your display space for it? I think they are best done remotely in a refugium. Just my .02
Someone mentioned that a thick sandbed is good for nitrate and other nutrients but in the long run it will cause your system to fail. Potentially killing everything in your tank. Is this correct??
 
Joined
Nov 27, 2009
Messages
3,098
Likes
24
Points
0
Location
Brea, CA
#33
Someone mentioned that a thick sandbed is good for nitrate and other nutrients but in the long run it will cause your system to fail. Potentially killing everything in your tank. Is this correct??
I agree completely. I had a 4-6" sandbed that stopped "working" and my nitrates were off the chart. My fish were still healthy so i assumed my amm and nitrites were ok, though i did not test them. I slowly started removing it in August and am getting close to where i can put the new bigger stuff in...
 
Top