Swc-160 cone or asm g3 on new setup

[MRCYCS805]

Hey fellas just looking for some opinions here as i've been googling both skimmers like crazy trying to make up my mind on which one to use and am getting mixed info on both mostly there ratings the swc160 is rated for 100-150gal which they claim as true #'s and the asm g3 is rated up to 250gal which everyone says is over rated actually in between 125-250gal . Im planning on running one of these on my new build 60"x18"x25" 110gal display with a 50 gal sump . I find myself stuck as my g3 runs a sedra 5000"500gph" and the swc is a atmann 2500 at around 740gph i believe not sure on the atmanns gph thats the only info i could find . Which one would you rock out and which one would u toss out lol!!! Any info is really appreciated thnks guys.




Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 4

 

[turbonut]

Swc hands down. It will blow the doors off asm

sent from my s4

 

[Usingthejohn]

No experience with ASM but I have an SWC extreme 200 and it pulls tons of crap out of my tank

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk 4

 

[SchnitzelReef]

If its only between those two, then def SWC. But I'd check out CADLights skinners as well. ALOT of bang for your buck

 

[cymaster007]

SWC has my vote for $ per gallon of sludge pulled out

 

[MRCYCS805]

Thanks for all the input fellas Yeah i already have both skimmers im runnin the asm g3 on my 90 and swooped up the swc-160 this weekend hopefully one of em will work on my new setup i really dig the build quality and look of the cone its freakin sexy lol

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 4

 

[MRCYCS805]

.

Sent from my PG86100 using Tapatalk 4