I think for established reefs like yours with big SPS colonies, you can get away with a lot more. The SPS is already used to your system. Even if a few spots of your SPS colony reacts, you can recover once you fix the issue...it's more forgiving.
But for my 6 month old reef, the tiny little 1/2" SPS frags hasn't even encrusted yet, they don't tolerate as much. Once those little nubs react, it's done. I don't think they are recovering. Plus I probably have other problems, and not just phosphate. I also have sand, which probably keeps a lot more gunk. It takes a lot longer for me to fix a phosphate problem.
I have sand and just put 12 tiny frags in a while ago and they’re doing pretty good. I would consider bacteria (the lack of) more of an issue than nutrients. I’m not sure if you started with dry rock or established rock? I would spend money on some established rock or some actual ocean rock. That’s why dry rock tanks don’t do well with tiny frags. The only way to get dry rock systems going is to either wait for a year or more, or stock the tank with colonies (which come with all the bacteria they need) from the start. I honestly think dry rock is one of the worst things to happen in this hobby, especially for new hobbyists who don’t fully understand the basic fundamentals of reefing. Btw, I’m not saying this to you directly, but as a general statement.
I think all of these videos from BRS and the like, have scared people from using established rock because they think they’re going to prevent the bad things from entering the system adds they can sell overpriced, ugly Marco rock. Meanwhile, they’ve created this sterile system that can’t fully support the animals they want to keep. Kinda seems counterintuitive to me?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
